Right to Repair Has a Point — But the Warranty Is Still the Underused Tool
I published a piece in The Conversation last month arguing that consumers are fighting for the right to repair while largely unaware of existing protections — specifically the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (1975), which already prohibits voiding a warranty for using independent parts or mechanics. The enforcement infrastructure exists but could be better. What's missing is consumer awareness and regulatory aggression. The piece is here.
The operations argument: manufacturers are mis-framing warranties as sunk costs rather than strategic assets. Firms most threatened by R2R mandates are likely ones that are struggling to build efficient service networks — their resistance to repair access is a symptom of that weakness, not a cause. Hyundai and Apple illustrate the alternative: strong warranty programs used to retain customers and differentiate, not just absorb costs.
The Deere settlement ($99M, April 2026) and Trump's Oval Office comments in June signal the R2R movement may be accerlerating. The question I am interesting in and will be happy to hear about is: in a world where repair market access is mandated, what would be the new role of warranties?